Ortiz v. Superintendent
| Edwin Ortiz |
| Superintendent |
| 1:2020cv05561 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LETTER from E. Ortiz dated 8/5/20 re: I have been waiting befor December of 2011. Some mail I have been sending here and waiting etc. Check out Clerk, U.S. District Court, P.O. Box 7367, 100 S. Clinton Street, Syracuse, New York 13261-7367. Document filed by Edwin Ortiz.(sc) |
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Northern District of New York acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 9:20-cv-00857, filed on 07/31/2020. (sjo) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order, to Edwin Ortiz at DIN No. 94A3113, Clinton Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 2001, Dannemora, NY 12929. (dsh) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of New York. (nb) |
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/24/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Filing 2 LETTER from Edwin Ortiz, dated 7/11/20 re: In Good Behavior there are allowance procedures. We are to have one-third of our sentence, not Life withourt Parole. This means a sentence, and Life is not the same as Life Without Parole, which means Life Imprisonment etc. Document filed by Edwin Ortiz.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Superintendent. Document filed by Edwin Ortiz. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz v. Superintendent | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Superintendent | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwin Ortiz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
