Dadgostari v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
Plaintiff: Javad Dadgostari
Defendant: It's Contractors Affiliates, et al and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Case Number: 1:2020cv07999
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: On October 13, 2020, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff, advising that he wishes to withdraw his complaint. (ECF No. 5.) Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's request to withdraw this action pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The complaint is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Plaintiff's application for the Court to request counsel (ECF No. 5) is denied as moot. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/13/2020) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
November 12, 2020 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 LETTER from J. Dadgostari, dated 10/12/20 re: I am a Pro Se litigant; and I hereby withdraw my complaint number 20cv07999. Document filed by Javad Dadgostari.(sc)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Javad Dadgostari consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Javad Dadgostari..(rdz)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel. Document filed by Javad Dadgostari.(rdz)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigations, It's Contractors Affiliates, et al. Document filed by Javad Dadgostari. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit).(rdz)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Javad Dadgostari..(rdz)
September 28, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dadgostari v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: It's Contractors Affiliates, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Javad Dadgostari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?