Thomason v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Adrian Thomason
Defendant: Target Corporation and Target Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv08982
Filed: October 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: John P Cronan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John P. Cronan: Telephone Conference held on December 16, 2020. The parties shall submit a joint letter updating the Court on the status of this case by June 26, 2021. (No Court Reporter Present) (mhe)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. 636(c). All Fact Discovery due by 4/24/2021. Depositions shall be completed by 3/30/2021. All expert discovery, including expert depositions, shall be completed no later than 6/19/2021. All Discovery due by 6/19/2021. This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 3-4 days, and as previously and further specified in this Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. The parties shall submit a joint status letter updating the Court on the status of the case by June 26, 2021. So ordered. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 12/16/2020) (rjm)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court construes the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal against Target Enterprises, Inc., Dkt. 9, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because the stipulation has been signed by all parties who have appeared, id., the Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to dismiss this action against Defendant Target Enterprises, Inc. and terminate Target Enterprises, Inc. as a party in this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to amend the caption of the case to delete Target Enterprises, Inc. as a defendant. All future documents filed with the Court shall reflect this amended caption. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Dkt. 9, paragraph 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint is deemed amended to change the date of October 10, 2020 to October 10, 2017., Target Enterprises, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 12/10/2020) (nb)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Glen Schiesel on behalf of Adrian Thomason..(Schiesel, Steven)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Target Enterprises, Inc.. Document filed by Target Enterprises, Inc., Target Corporation. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Spitz, Alice)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Target Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Target Enterprises, Inc., Target Corporation. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Spitz, Alice) Modified on 12/9/2020 (km).
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by Target Corporation, Target Enterprises, Inc...(Spitz, Alice)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Alice Spitz, Esq. dated 12/8/2020 re: Joint Letter to the Court as Per Court Order. Document filed by Target Corporation, Target Enterprises, Inc...(Spitz, Alice)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Alice Spitz. RE-FILE Document No. #8 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared (handwritten signatures). The title of the document needs to be a stipulation of voluntary dismissal. Your document and docket text do not match. When refiling, select no when you get to the part it asks if it pursuant to Rule 41(a), your document does not state that it is. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents. (km)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #9 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge John P. Cronan for approval for the following reason(s): the stipulation of dismissal is not pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (km)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. Document filed by Adrian Thomason.(Schiesel, Steven)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Target Corporation, Target Enterprises, Inc...(Spitz, Alice)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: Counsel for all parties are hereby ORDERED to appear before the undersigned for an Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on December 16, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Court will conduct the IPTC by teleconference. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261. (As further set forth in this Order.) Initial Conference set for 12/16/2020 at 12:00 PM before Judge John P. Cronan. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/5/2020) (cf)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John P. Cronan. Judge Analisa Torres is no longer assigned to the case. (ad)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Alice Spitz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jurisdiction code 3 (Federal Question); Cause of Action code 28:1391; Citizenship Plaintiff code 7 (NONE); Citizenship Defendant code 7 (NONE); County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jurisdiction code has been modified to 4 (Diversity); the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1441nr; the Citizenship Plaintiff code has been modified to 1 (Citizen of This State); the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 5 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-Other State); the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pc)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Spitz, Alice)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of The State of New York, County of Bronx. Case Number: 30296/2020. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22331108).Document filed by Target Enterprises, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Spitz, Alice)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomason v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrian Thomason
Represented By: Steven Glen Schiesel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Alice Spitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Alice Spitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?