Moore v. Saul
| Michael Moore |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv10326 |
| December 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul..(gp)
|
|
Filing 9
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Michael Moore. (sc)
|
|
Filing 8
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Michael Moore.(Leifer, Max) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Modified on 12/14/2020 (dt).
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REJECTION OF PROPOSED CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Notice to Attorney Max Leifer re: Document #8 Proposed Order, was rejected by the Clerk's Office for the following reason, the Consent to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge should not be electronically filed. Please download and review the Local Rules, Judge's Individual Rules of Practice and ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (dt)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Leifer, Max)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Max D. Leifer. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Arbitration code e (Exempt); Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Arbitration code has been deleted; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Max D. Leifer to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the form used for the civil cover sheet is not the S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet form dated October 1, 2020; Jury Demand code was not selected. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Max D. Leifer. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michael Moore; Andrew Saul. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (jgo)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Michael Moore..(Leifer, Max)
|
|
Filing 4
FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Leifer, Max) Modified on 12/9/2020 (jgo).
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Michael Moore..(Leifer, Max)
|
|
Filing 2
FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Michael Moore..(Leifer, Max)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22935919)Document filed by Michael Moore..(Leifer, Max)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
