Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Simmons [ENJOINED] v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2026cv12331
Petitioner:
Latausha Simmons [ENJOINED]
Respondent:
Michael Bouchard and Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Keith Sumblin v. Michael Moore
as 26-6676
Plaintiff:
KEITH SUMBLIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOORE, Sheriff for Portsmouth Sheriff's Office and Staff Operate under the direction of the Portsmouth Sheriff's Office, in individual capacity, R. T. BROWN, Badge # 647, in individual capacity, J. JAMES, Badge # 6364, in individual capacity and others
MOORE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2026cv02862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOORE
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stratmann v. Ivankovich et al
as 0:2026cv61150
Defendant:
Steven Ivankovich, Dr. Anthony Ivankovich, Tom Ackel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jacob Stratmann
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moore v. Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
as 2:2026cv01514
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
as 2:2026at00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
as 2:2026cv01513
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SHERWOOD v. MOORE et al
as 2:2026cv00492
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A SHERWOOD, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOORE, RONDAL HAGERTY, JR., RONDAL HAGERTY, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Hover-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
