Chirse v. Pauselius et al
Devante Chirse |
Martin, Sgt. D. Pauselius, D. Clemonson, SORC J. Abrams, Igre Macklin, Shu D. Venozzotti, T. Steward and L. Bacon |
1:2020cv11040 |
December 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Colleen McMahon |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Western District of New York acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 6:21-cv-06049, filed on 01/20/2021. (sjo) |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Western District of New York.(nb) |
|
Mailed a copy of #5 Order, to Devante Chirse, 15-A-1824 at Southport Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 2000, 236 Bob Masia Dr., Pinecity, NY 14871. (dsh) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(rdz) |
Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Devante Chirse..(rdz) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against J. Abrams, L. Bacon, D. Clemonson, Igre Macklin, Martin, D. Pauselius, T. Steward, D. Venozzotti. Document filed by Devante Chirse..(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Devante Chirse..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.