Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
| Towaki Komatsu |
| NYPD Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Paul Ochea, Jane Doe2, Charles Aidinoff, Cyrus Vance, Jr., The City of New York, Sergeant Philip Sansone, Nick Smith, Anthony Shorris, NYPD Officer Lee, James O'Neill, NYPD Jane Doe1, NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond, Bill de Blasio and Lawrence Byrne, Jr. |
| 1:2021cv00204 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appeal Fee Due: for #5 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 3/2/2021. (tp) |
| Appeal Remark as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Towaki Komatsu. IFP Denied 02/11/2021. (tp) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #5 Notice of Appeal. (tp) |
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Towaki Komatsu were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #3 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp) |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to Towaki Komatsu at 802 Fairmount Pl., Apt. 4B, Bronx, NY 10460. (dsh) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order of Dismissal, to Towaki Komatsu at 802 Fairmount Pl., Apt. 4B, Bronx, NY 10460. (Attachments: # 1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (dsh) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the December 15, 2020 order in Komatsu v. City of New York, ECF 1:20-CV-7046, 45 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2020). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/11/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the December 15, 2020 order in Komatsu v. City of New York, ECF 1:20-CV-7046, 45. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/11/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Charles Aidinoff, Andrew Berkowitz, Lawrence Byrne, Jr, Jane Doe1, Jane Doe2, Lee, James O'Neill, Paul Ochea, Howard Redmond, Philip Sansone, Anthony Shorris, Nick Smith, The City of New York, Cyrus Vance, Jr, Bill de Blasio. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu. (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
