Andrew et al v. 64 Fulton St. Food Corp.
| Omar Andrew, Rodrigo Vasquez and Washington Calle |
| 64 Fulton St. Food Corp. doing business as Seaport Deli |
| 1:2021cv01196 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 4/8/2021. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/10/19) (rpr)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by 64 Fulton St. Food Corp...(Hans, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by 64 Fulton St. Food Corp...(Hans, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen D. Hans on behalf of 64 Fulton St. Food Corp...(Hans, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Melissa Seelig on behalf of Omar Andrew, Washington Calle, Rodrigo Vasquez..(Seelig, Anne) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/12/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at 10:20 a.m. on June 14, 2021, to be held telephonically. The parties are directed to dial 888-398-2342 or 215-861-0674, and enter access code 5598827. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Initial Conference set for 6/14/2021 at 10:20 AM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/12/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/12/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 64 Fulton St. Food Corp...(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney C.K. Lee. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Omar Andrew; Rodrigo Vasquez; Washington Calle. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Washington Calle..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Rodrigo Vasquez..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Omar Andrew..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 64 Fulton St. Food Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Omar Andrew, Washington Calle, Rodrigo Vasquez..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 64 Fulton St. Food Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23888545)Document filed by Omar Andrew, Washington Calle, Rodrigo Vasquez..(Lee, C.K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
