Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02220
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vasquez-Hernandez v. United States of Amercia
as 5:2025cv10163
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Vasquez Hernandez
Defendant:
Dao Vang, California Health Care Facility and Warden Vao Vang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1424
Petitioner:
RODRIGO VASQUEZ RINCON and LUCIANA GABRIELA VASQUEZ GALVIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Andrew et al v. 64 Fulton St. Food Corp.
as 1:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
Omar Andrew, Rodrigo Vasquez and Washington Calle
Defendant:
64 Fulton St. Food Corp. doing business as Seaport Deli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plastic Source Workers Committee, et al v. Coburn, et al
as 2:2016mc00102
Plaintiff:
Plastic Source Workers Committee , Brenda C Aburto , Brenda Aguilar and others
Defendant:
David G Coburn, International Manufacturing Solutions Corporation and Electrolux Home Care Products Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hernandez v. Grounds
as 3:2015cv03279
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Vasquez Hernandez
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodrigo Vasquez-Lopez v. Attorney General United State
as 14-1359
Petitioner:
RODRIGO VASQUEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodrigo Vasquez-Lopez v. Attorney General United State
as 12-1504
Petitioner:
RODRIGO VASQUEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gabriel et al v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2011cv01029
Plaintiff:
Bob Gabriel and Jill Gabriel
Defendant:
Rodrigo Vasquez, Equine Surgical Services, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
