DoorDash, Inc. et al v. City Of New York
DoorDash, Inc., Grubhub Inc. and Portier, LLC |
City Of New York |
1:2021cv07564 |
September 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Constitutional - State Statute |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 19 LETTER MOTION for Conference re Defendant's Anticipated Motion to Dismiss the Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Darren Trotter dated November 3, 2021. Document filed by City Of New York..(Trotter, Darren) |
![]() |
Filing 17 CONSENT LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Anne Champion dated October 21, 2021 re: joint request to adjourn conference and deadlines. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc., Grubhub Inc., Portier, LLC..(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Bernard Collins on behalf of City Of New York..(Collins, Kevin) |
![]() |
Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Darren Trotter dated September 30, 2021. Document filed by City Of New York..(Trotter, Darren) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Darren Michael Trotter on behalf of City Of New York..(Trotter, Darren) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #11 MOTION for Joshua Lipshutz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25083216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu) |
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION for Joshua Lipshutz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25083216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc., Grubhub Inc., Portier, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joshua Lipshutz, #2 Exhibit A- Certificates of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order).(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. City Of New York served on 9/14/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. Service was accepted by Betty Mazyck, agent authorized to accept service. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc.; Portier, LLC; Grubhub Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
![]() |
Filing 8 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate SoftBank Group Corp., Other Affiliate SVF FAST (CAYMAN) LIMITED for DoorDash, Inc.. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City Of New York. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Anne Marie Champion to RE-FILE Document #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). YOU MUST SELECT THE SEARCH BUTTON. Select the correct name or create a new corporate parent. Add the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s) one party name at a time. (lb) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Anne Marie Champion. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City of New York, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc., Grubhub Inc., Portier, LLC..(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Uber Technologies, Inc. for Portier, LLC. Document filed by Portier, LLC..(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Just Eat Takeaway.com N.V. for Grubhub Inc.. Document filed by Grubhub Inc...(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by DoorDash, Inc...(Champion, Anne) Modified on 9/10/2021 (lb). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Champion, Anne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Of New York. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25041361)Document filed by DoorDash, Inc., Portier, LLC, Grubhub Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Int. No. 2359-A, #2 Exhibit B - Int. No. 2390, #3 Exhibit C - Correspondence, #4 Exhibit D - Int. No. 1908-B, #5 Exhibit E - Int. No. 2054-A, #6 Exhibit F - E.O. 202.108, #7 Exhibit G - Int. No. 1897-A).(Champion, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.