Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Haynie v. DoorDash, Inc
as 4:2024cv04123
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc
Plaintiff:
Howard L Haynie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
City v. Salazar et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Leo City
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc. and Richard Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Boampong v. Mejia-Gross et al
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Charles Kofi Boampong
Defendant:
Simon Mejia-Gross and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Leubner v. DoorDash Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Misty Leubner
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc, Orlando Long, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims, Shareef Brown, Delron D. Mims and others
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cristo v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cristo
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Patent Armory Inc. v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stewart v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Carla Stewart
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Proszak et al v. Doordash, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prozak, Leonardo Leiva Rivera and Natalie Proszak
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc., Sarah Ambrose, Matthew Faul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
