Lopez et al v. P E C Group Ltd et al
| William Ramones, Jorge Molina, Carlos Lopez a/k/a Neri Lopez, Carlos Lopez and Neri Lopez |
| P E C Group Ltd, d/b/a Pepolino Ristorante Italiano a/k/a Pepolino, Patrizio Siddu, Enzo Pezone, P E C Group Ltd doing business as Pepolino Ristorante Italiano also known as Pepolino and Pepolino |
| 1:2021cv08806 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. P E C Group Ltd waiver sent on 11/1/2021, answer due 1/3/2022; Enzo Pezone waiver sent on 11/1/2021, answer due 1/3/2022; Patrizio Siddu waiver sent on 11/1/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. Document filed by Carlos Lopez; William Ramones; Jorge Molina..(Nussbaum, Yosef) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to P E C Group Ltd, Enzo Pezone, Patrizio Siddu..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): If jurisdiction is Federal Question, do not fill out citizenship of principal parties. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: P E C Group Ltd, d/b/a Pepolino Ristorante Italiano a/k/a Pepolino, Carlos Lopez a/k/a Neri Lopez, William Ramones, Jorge Molina. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted; alias party name was omitted;. (pc) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kirschenbaum, Daniel) Modified on 10/29/2021 (pc). |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to PEC Group Ltd, d/b/a Pepolino Ristorante Italiano a/k/a Pepolino, Patrizio Siddu, Enzo Pezone, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Carlos Lopez a/k/a Neri Lopez, Jorge Molina, William Ramones..(Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against P E C Group Ltd, d/b/a Pepolino Ristorante Italiano a/k/a Pepolino, Enzo Pezone, Patrizio Siddu. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25256894)Document filed by Carlos Lopez a/k/a Neri Lopez, William Ramones, Jorge Molina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Sue).(Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
