M.A. v. New York City Board of Education
| M.A. on behalf of her minor child, S.A. and M.A. |
| The New York City Board of Education, d/b/a the New York City Department of Education and New York City Board Of Education doing business as New York City Department Of Education, |
| 1:2022cv06159 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SCHEDULING AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: If a conforming case management plan is submitted at least two business days prior to the scheduled initial conference and subsequently approved by the Court, the initial conference will be canceled automatically. If a motion has been filed either before or after the case management plan is approved, and the parties desire a conference, a letter must be submitted to the Court via fax specifically asking that the initial conference not be canceled. If the parties fail to agree upon such a plan or fail to submit the plan to the Court within the time provided ( at least two business days before the conference date), the parties must participate in a telephone conference on 1/5/2023 at 10:00 a.m. Parties should dial in at 1(888)363-4749, access code (9054506) to join the conference. Initial Conference set for 1/5/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/15/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hyunjung Kim on behalf of New York City Board Of Education..(Kim, Hyunjung) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Mart Bowe dated 08/15/2022. Extension of 90 days granted. New York City Board Of Education answer due 11/15/2022. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/16/2022) (mml)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Frederick J. Berman dated 08/16/2022 re: #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Mart Bowe dated 08/15/2022. . Document filed by M.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email requesting billing records for this lawsuit).(Berman, Frederick) |
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Mart Bowe dated 08/15/2022. Document filed by New York City Board Of Education..(Bowe, Martin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin John Bowe, Jr on behalf of New York City Board Of Education..(Bowe, Martin) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. M.A. served on 7/27/2022, answer due 8/17/2022. Service was accepted by Office of the Corporation Counsel for the City of New York via email. Document filed by M.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AOS Proof of Service Receipt 7-27-22).(Berman, Frederick) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Board Of Education..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Frederick J. Berman. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: M.A. on behalf of her minor child, S.A., The New York City Board of Education, d/b/a the New York City Department of Education. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Frederick J. Berman. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand blank; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $37,000; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The New York City Board of Education d/b/a The New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by M.A. on behalf of her minor child, S.A...(Berman, Frederick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Berman, Frederick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The New York City Board of Education, d/b/a the New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26438557)Document filed by M.A. on behalf of her minor child, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Invoices, #2 Exhibit Attorney Resumes, #3 Exhibit Fee Summary).(Berman, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
