Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McCormack v. Delafoisse
as 4:2026cv04115
Petitioner:
Williams A. McCormack
Respondent:
M.A. Delafoisse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Van Arsdale v. Education Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv03885
Plaintiff:
Rachele M. Van Arsdale
Defendant:
Education Plus Corporation, Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1238
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
M.A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv06188
Plaintiff:
M.A.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Albert v. Paxton
as 26-50392
Plaintiff:
Monte Albert, individually and as next friend of Minor Child M.A.
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, in his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wahba v. M.A 2 Flags Contracting Corp.
as 1:2026cv02593
Plaintiff:
Mahmoud Wahba
Defendant:
M.A 2 Flags Contracting Corp.
Counter-Claimant:
M.A 2 Flags Contracting Corp.
Counter-Defendant:
Mahmoud Wahba
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cunningham v. M.A. Carrillo (Badge 2901) et al
as 1:2026cv02287
Plaintiff:
David Cunningham
Defendant:
M.A. Carrillo (Badge 2901), James D. Ferrell, Patsy Austin-Gatson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
