Emrit v. FBI
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| FBI |
| 1:2023cv02540 |
| March 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 10. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit 6655 38th Lane East Sarasota, FL 34243. (kh) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 11. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit 6655 38th Lane East Sarasota, FL 34243. (kh) |
Filing 11
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the April 4, 2023, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/4/23) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: In an order dated May 16, 2014, the court barred Plaintiff from filing any future civil action in forma pauperis ("IFP") in this court without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Emrit v. AOL Time Warner, ECF 1:14-CV-0314, 13 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2014). Plaintiff originally filed this pro se action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, where he originally sought leave to proceed IFP. By order dated February 14, 2023, that court transferred this action here. (ECF 8.) Plaintiff has not sought leave to file from the transferor court or from this court. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice due to Plaintiffs failure to comply with the courts May 16, 2014, order in Emrit, 1:14-CV-0314. The Court denies all pending motions as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/4/23) (rdz)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sgz) |
| Filing 9 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of Connecticut; Case Number: 3:22-cv-01490. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE - TRANSFER CASE: This case is assigned to: Unassigned Judge. (vba) |
| NOTE TO OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS: Please visit the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/ for information regarding admission to the S.D.N.Y. Bar and the CM/ECF Rules & Filing Instructions. (vba) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vba) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER transferring case. The Clerk of Court is asked, respectfully, to transfer this case to the Southern District of New York and to close this action. See attached for details. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 2/14/23. (Wagner, Rebecca) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Returning Submission as Deficient: Appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals returned to Ronald Satish Emrit as to Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 12/20/2022. (Barry, L) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION in Limine by Ronald Satish Emrit. Responses due by 12/29/2022 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Barry, L) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.] |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 11/17/2022.(Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.]
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 11/17/2022.(Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.]
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/16/2023; Discovery due by 5/19/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 6/23/2023. Signed by Clerk on 11/17/2022.(Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FBI, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.] |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 3/25/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Emrit v. FBI | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FBI | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
