Watson v. Miller
| Shalik Watson |
| Mark Miller |
| 1:2023cv08356 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Original Signature Received from Shalik Watson re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sac) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Shalik Watson.(sc) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $5.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 10/31/2023, Receipt Number 22750. (ehn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David M. Cohn on behalf of Mark Miller. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service).(Cohn, David) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2-3. Mailed to: Shalik Watson DIN:14A5144 P.O. Box 4000 Stormville, NY 12582. (sha) |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Petitioner is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 10/23/2023. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 10/23/2023. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/21/2023) (sha)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE: Petitioner is directed to submit a signed signature page to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signature Page due by 10/23/2023. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/21/2023) (sha)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. County of Conviction: Bronx. Document filed by Shalik Watson. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watson v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shalik Watson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mark Miller | |
| Represented By: | David M. Cohn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
