Lin v. Mayorkas et al
| Zhong Lin |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Susan Raufer and Christopher A. Wray |
| 1:2024cv01290 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie Figueredo |
| Lewis A Kaplan |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Ur M. Jaddou served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024; Susan Raufer served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024; Christopher A. Wray served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Zhong Lin..(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony Pantoja on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray..(Pantoja, Joseph) |
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). Referred to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/4/24) (yv)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray, re: #4 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Zhong Lin..(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray.Document filed by Zhong Lin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and Exhibit B).(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Yevgeny Samokhleb. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Yevgeny Samokhleb to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; the attached PDF reflects "Amended". Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 2/27/2024. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Yevgeny Samokhleb to RE-FILE Document No. #3 The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The summons requested was not processed due to the deficient pleading. Please file your request for summons when you correct and refile your pleading. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR SUMMONS NOT LINKED TO CORRESPONDING PLEADING- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Zhong Lin..(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) Modified on 2/22/2024 (vf). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Susan Raufer, Christopher A. Wray (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28972444).Document filed by Zhong Lin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and Exhibit B).(Samokhleb, Yevgeny) Modified on 2/22/2024 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
