Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lin v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Zhong Lin
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Susan Raufer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08753
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wu v. Rock Of Ages Corporation
as 1:2021cv03756
Plaintiff:
Zhong Lin Wu
Defendant:
Rock Of Ages Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lin v. BICKMAN et al
as 5:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Walde PHIL BICKMAN, Acting Director THOMAS D HOMAN, Secretary of DHS KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Jinzhong Lin and JIN ZHONG LIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luo v. Tristar Plumbing Supply Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05849
Defendant:
Bao Ling Liang, Zhi Zhong Lin, Logo Mechanical Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hai Qing Luo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ningbo Zhong Lin Foreign Trade Co. v. Saideh et al
as 1:2016cv04910
Plaintiff:
Ningbo Zhong Lin Foreign Trade Co., Ningboshi Yinzhou Zhenxing Package Factory and Jiazhen Zheng
Defendant:
Saideh, Jack Saideh and Zeikos Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jason v. Bo et al
as 1:2013cv02280
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Jason
Defendant:
Zhong Bo, Zhong Lin, Yang Ai Mei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
