Bottom v. Capra et al
| Devin C. Bottom |
| M. Capra, M. Royce, R. Moss, C. James and A. Boro |
| 1:2015cv04615 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Chemung |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER re: 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Capra, R. Moss, A. Boro, M. Royce, C. James. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #93) and close this case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/19/2018) (mml) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by R. Moss, A. Boro, M. Royce, M. Capra, C. James. Defendants' motion is DENIED as to the claim against all defendants for failure to protect plaintiff from the September 17, 2014, assault. Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to all other claims. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #20). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 8/4/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
