Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Meir v. Royce
as 23-7962
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERICK MEIR
Respondent / Appellee:
M. ROYCE, Superintendent
ROYCE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13272
Plaintiff:
DAWNETTA M ROYCE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade v. Royce
as 21-2185
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raymond Wade
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent M. Royce
Meir v. Royce
as 1:2021cv00329
Respondent:
M. Royce
Petitioner:
Erick Meir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gross v. Royce et al
as 2:2020cv03037
Respondent:
The Attorney General of New York and Superintendent Mr, M, Royce
Petitioner:
James Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dupree v. Royce
as 1:2020cv01443
Respondent:
Superintendent M. Royce
Petitioner:
Reginald Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banner v. Royce
as 2:2020cv00424
Petitioner:
Damon Banner
Respondent:
Supt. M. Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Royce
as 2:2020cv00171
Respondent:
Superintendent M. Royce
Petitioner:
Raymond Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. State of New York Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv11280
Defendant:
Deputy Supt. Kelly, G.H.C.F. Leanty Stuard, State of New York Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. State of New York Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv06578
Defendant:
Deputy Supt. Kelly, G.H.C.F. Leanty Stuard, State of New York Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
