David Neiman et, al v. Adi J. Neuman et. al
| David Neiman and Esther Neiman-Bauer |
| Adi J. Neuman, Refuah Health Center and United States Of America |
| 7:2016cv07713 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Rockland |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted in the above entitled action are settled, it is hereby ORDERED, that the above entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to any party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be concluded within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 2/25/2021) (ks)
|
|
Filing
53
COMPROMISE ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 832D: NOW, on the motion of SCHWARTZ GOLDSTONE CAMPISI & KA TES, LLP., attorneys for the plaintiffs herein, it is hereby, ORDERED, that this matter is settled for the total sum of TWO MILLION FIVE HUN DRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($2,500,000.00), against defendant UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA; and it is further ORDERED, that the total settlement of TWO MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($2,500,000.00) be paid by the defe ndant under the Order of Compromise, and be allocated as follows: $1,000,000.00 for the benefit of CHAYA S. NEIMAN, an Incapacitated Person be paid to the annuity specified in the attached Stipulation of Settlement; (b) $875,000.00 for t he benefit of DAVID NEIMAN, individually. As further set forth in this Order. The sum of SIX HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($625,000.00) be allowed and made payable from the settlement proceeds to SCHWARTZ GOLDSTONE CAMPISI & KATES, LLP, as full payment for their fees for professional services rendered to Plaintiff DAVID NEIMAN herein, and expenditures made on Plaintiffs' behalf; ORDERED, that DAVID NEIMAN, as Guardian for the Person and Property of CHAYA S. NEI MAN, an Incapacitated Person, be and hereby is authorized to execute and deliver releases and any and all papers necessary to effectuate such settlement and collect such monies herein, and it is further ORDERED, that upon full payment of all of th e aforesaid amounts, defendant shall have no further liability herein; and it is further ORDERED, that upon compliance with the terms of this Order, plaintiffs' attorneys are authorized to execute, deliver, and file a stipulation of discontinu ance; and it is further ORDERED, that SCHWARTZ GOLDSTONE CAMPISI & KATES, LLC, shall continue to serve as attorneys for DAVID NEIMAN, as Guardian for the Person and Property of CHAYA S. NEIMAN, an Incapacitated Person, until the final disposition of the settlement funds. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 2/12/2021) (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER: Beginning March 30, 2020, until further notice, all parties to civil conferences before Judge Davison shall attend by phone, using the following information: Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1839 Access Code: 5999739 The parties should call in f rom a landline and announce their names before speaking. For Settlement Conferences: Clients should NOT be on the conference call. Counsel must have ready telephonic access to clients. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 4/10/2020) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
