Cato v. Westchester Medical Center et al
Reynold Cato |
Westchester Medical Center, Mark Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Medical "T", Doctor Ozu, Doctor Ashton "A", Nurse Brewer, Nurse Andrew, Nurse Mathew, Nurse Solstice, Nurse Alexandria, The State of New York, Doctor McGill, Deputy Superintendent Tuey, Doctor Bentevenjz, Sergeant Noriega, Jane Doe Assistant Commissioner, Jane Doe PREA Deputy Superintendent, First Deputy Superintendent Williams, Deputy Superintendent Demshik, DOCCS Special Investigations Officer Shawn Hanley and Deacon Brucner |
7:2024cv02209 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Cathy Seibel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alexandria, Brewer, Deacon Brucner, DOCCS Special Investigations Officer Shawn Hanley, Deputy Superintendent Demshik, Deputy Superintendent Tuey, Doctor Ashton, Doctor Bentevenjz, Doctor Ozu, First Deputy Superintendent Williams, Mathew, McGill, Mark Miller, Sergeant Noriega, Solstice, Westchester Medical Center. (aan) |
FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 5/2/2024 Re: Judge Cathy Seibel #7 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Complaint, Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s)Alexandria, Brewer, Deacon Brucner, DOCCS Special Investigations Officer Shawn Hanley, Deputy Superintendent Demshik, Deputy Superintendent Tuey, Doctor Ashton, Doctor Bentevenjz, Doctor Ozu, First Deputy Superintendent Williams, Mathew, McGill, Mark Miller, Sergeant Noriega, Solstice, Westchester Medical Center. (aan) |
Mailed a copy of #1 Complaint, #7 Order of Service, to Attorney General of the State of New York, at 28 Liberty Street, 16th Floor, New York, New York 10005. (aan) |
![]() |
Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #7 Order of Service to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (mml) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sgz) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Cathy Seibel. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sgz) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Reynold Cato 09-A-4912 Elmira Correctional Facility 1879 Davis Street P.O. Box 500 Elmira, NY 14901-0500. ; and to Warden, Elmira Correctional Facility (sha) |
![]() |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Reynold Cato 09-A-4912 Elmira Correctional & Reception Center P.O. Box 500 Elmira, NY 14902-0600. (anc) Modified on 3/26/2024 (anc). |
![]() |
Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Reynold Cato..(rdz) |
Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Reynold Cato..(rdz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alexandria, Andrew, Brewer, Deputy Superintendent of Medical "T", Doctor Ashton "A", Doctor Ozu, Mathew, McGill, Mark Miller, Solstice, The State of New York, Westchester Medical Center. Document filed by Reynold Cato..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.