Hardy v. Astrue

Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Evone L. Hardy
Case Number: 1:2012cv00112
Filed: February 8, 2012
Court: New York Western District Court
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 26, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Defendant's 6 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; GRANTING Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; REMANDING this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for proceedings consistent with this Decision and Order; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny on 2/25/2013. (CLERK TO FOLLOW UP) (MEAL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardy v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evone L. Hardy
Represented By: Lewis L. Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.