James v. Martuscello et al
Jesse James |
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James, Carol Moores, Christopher Yehl, Mr. White, Ms. Brady, LT. Diehl, SGT. Johnson, SGT. Buster, SGT. Jones, SGT. Mack, SGT. Marcus, SGT. Price, SGT. Smith, C.O. Reid, Jane Doe (1), Jane Doe (2), Ms. S. Rodriqez, John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (4), John Doe (5), Ernest Lowerre, Thomas Delmar, Danyelle Hodges, Pamela Wyckoff, Christina Hill, Marc McGrain, James Biccum, David Bedient, James Conger, SGT. J. Lewis, SGT. H, Danielle Freeman, Jane Doe (3), Jane Doe (4), John Doe (6), John Doe (7), John Doe (8), John Doe (9), John Doe (10), Danielle Seehas, Amy Carr and Kristen Salotti |
1:2024cv00168 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
John L Sinatra |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from Jesse James, dated 3/31/2024, to Clerk. (CGJ) |
Filing 6 Letter from Jesse James, dated 3/20/2024, to U.S. District Court Clerk (CGJ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesse James. (CGJ) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Brady, Buster, Diehl, Johnson, Jones, Mack, Marcus, Price, Reid, SGT. H, Smith, White, Amy Carr, Anthony Annucci, Carol Moores, Christina Hill, Christopher Yehl, Daniel Martuscello, III, Danielle Freeman, Danielle Seehas, Danyelle Hodges, David Bedient, Ernest Lowerre, J. Lewis, James Biccum, James Conger, Jane Doe (1), Jane Doe (2), Jane Doe (3), Jane Doe (4), John Doe (1), John Doe (10), John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (4), John Doe (5), John Doe (6), John Doe (7), John Doe (8), John Doe (9), Kristen Salotti, Letitia James, Marc McGrain, Pamela Wyckoff, S. Rodriqez, Thomas Delmar against Jesse James. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 2/29/2024. (CGJ)This was mailed to: Jesse James. |
Filing 3 ORDER that the case shall be administratively terminated. If James wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than March 29, 2024. This writing must include either: (1) a signed authorization form; or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total). Upon James's submission of either (1) a signed authorization form, or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee ($405.00 total), the Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 2/28/2024. (CGJ)Order, in forma pauperis and authorization form mailed to: Jesse James. |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesse James. (CGJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Annucci, David Bedient, James Biccum, Brady, Buster, Amy Carr, James Conger, Thomas Delmar, Diehl, Jane Doe (1), John Doe (1), John Doe (10), Jane Doe (2), John Doe (2), Jane Doe (3), John Doe (3), Jane Doe (4), John Doe (4), John Doe (5), John Doe (6), John Doe (7), John Doe (8), John Doe (9), Danielle Freeman, Christina Hill, Danyelle Hodges, Letitia James, Johnson, Jones, J. Lewis, Ernest Lowerre, Mack, Marcus, Daniel Martuscello, III, Marc McGrain, Carol Moores, Price, Reid, S. Rodriqez, SGT. H, Kristen Salotti, Danielle Seehas, Smith, White, Pamela Wyckoff, Christopher Yehl, filed by Jesse James. (CGJ) |
Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (CGJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.