Morrison v. Hartman et al
Plaintiff: Patrick J Morrison
Defendant: E. J. Hartman, Kozlowski and Kingsley
Case Number: 6:2007cv06633
Filed: December 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Dutchess
Presiding Judge: Jonathan W. Feldman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 101 PRETRIAL ORDER: Plaintiff to make a written settlement demand to defendants by by 2/10/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/17/2014 02:00 PM before Hon. David G. Larimer. Jury Trial set for 8/4/2014 08:30 AM before Hon. David G. Larimer. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 1/14/14. (EMA)
June 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER denying defendants' 92 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/25/13. (EMA)
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted as to plaintiff's claims of sexual abuse and verbal harassment against Defendants Hartman and Kingsley, and to the extent that plaintiff's claims are based on such alleged conduct, those claims are dismissed. In all other respects, defendants' motion is denied. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/9/12. (EMA)
March 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Compel; denying 51 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 3/19/2010. (RJO)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER denying defendants' 44 motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, without prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/3/10. (EMA)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment 51 . Plaintiff shall submit his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment no later than 9/24/09. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 8/27/09. (EMA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morrison v. Hartman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick J Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. J. Hartman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kozlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kingsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?