James v. Astrue

James v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Eileen James
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	6:2010cv06429
Filed:	July 27, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Monroe
Presiding Judge:	David G. Larimer
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 12, 2014	Filing 27 ORDER granting in part plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec.2412 21 , and plaintiff's counsel is entitled to fees and costs in the amount of $6,728.11. Pursuant to the Supreme Court's directives in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the award is to be made payable to plaintiff. Subject to the provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act and any other relevant provisions of federal and state law, plaintiff is ordered to remit whatever attorney fees are owed to her attorney, pursuant to the provisions of any existing fee agreement. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 12/12/14. (EMA)
September 15, 2011	Filing 17 ORDER that the Commissioner's cross motion for remand of this matter to the SSA 16 pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is granted. Plaintiff's pending motion for summary judgment 12 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/15/11. (EMA)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 12, 2014

Filing 27 ORDER granting in part plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec.2412 21 , and plaintiff's counsel is entitled to fees and costs in the amount of $6,728.11. Pursuant to the Supreme Court's directives in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the award is to be made payable to plaintiff. Subject to the provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act and any other relevant provisions of federal and state law, plaintiff is ordered to remit whatever attorney fees are owed to her attorney, pursuant to the provisions of any existing fee agreement. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 12/12/14. (EMA)

September 15, 2011

Filing 17 ORDER that the Commissioner's cross motion for remand of this matter to the SSA 16 pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is granted. Plaintiff's pending motion for summary judgment 12 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/15/11. (EMA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eileen James
Represented By:	Jere B. Fletcher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?