Phelan v. Zenzen et al
| Kenneth J. Phelan |
| S. Zenzen, Benett, Parish, Jones, McIntyre, Netti, Evans and Colvin |
| 6:2010cv06704 |
| December 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss all remaining claims by Plaintiff. Furthermore, these claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to take the necessary actions to dismiss these claims and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 01/31/2014. Copy of this Decision and Order and NEF have been sent via the USPS to pro se Plaintiff at Marcy C.F. (ST) -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss. The following claims are dismissed: Denial of access to the courts; denial of exercise in the recreation yard; denial of razor; denial of a pillow; styrofoam tray/denial of an eating utensil; placement of cell shield; and equal protection. The application is denied as to the 8th Amendment medical claims and the retaliation claims against Bennett, and the case will proceed as to those claims, and any claims which Defendants did not specifically move to dismiss.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/6/12. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
