Simpson v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Tanya L. Simpson
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 6:2011cv06500
Filed: October 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting only insofar as remanding this matter back to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the findings made in the Decision and Order 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 8/19/2013. (RJO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya L. Simpson
Represented By: Lynda J. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?