Medina v. Barrett et al
||Jason J. Barrett, D. McKeel, Thomas Sticht, Karen Crowley, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and R. Killinger
||July 10, 2014
||US District Court for the Western District of New York
||Frank P. Geraci
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 19, 2018
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Defendants' 38 motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and Plaintiff's 58 motion to appoint counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff's eleventh claim alleging denial of medical care is DISMISSED. All other claims remain and no Defendants are dismissed from the case. By separate Order, this case will be referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/19/18. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. (JO)
|March 30, 2016
ORDER. Medina's request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. After counsel is appointed, the Court will issue a scheduling order setting forth the time in which Medina's counsel may respond to the partial summary judgment mot ion (ECF No. 9). Medina need not himself respond to the partial summary judgment motion. The Court hereby directs the Pro Se Litigation Unit to identify an attorney who is willing to represent Medina in this matter and to advise this Court when pro bono counsel has been identified. SO ORDERED. This Order has been mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/30/2016. (BD)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?