Ramos v. Hy et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Ramos
Defendant: Richard Hy, John Beyer, Beyer and The Buffalo Police Department
Case Number: 6:2018cv06246
Filed: March 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 81 DECISION & ORDER Ramos's motion to compel 70 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants shall produce any additional responsive documents by no later than January 31, 2023. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 1/9/2023. (KAH)This was mailed to: Plaintiff Gregory Ramos.
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 65 DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 56) is DENIED. By separate order, the Court will schedule a status conference to hear about the progress of this action. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 5/16/2022. copy of text order and NEF mailed to plaintiff. (MFM)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER Plaintiff's motion to compel 49 is DENIED without prejudice. Ramos must first confer with defendants' counsel in good faith to try to resolve any disputes before filing another motion to compel. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 2/18/22. (CMC)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 44 DECISION & ORDER denying without prejudice 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel. It is plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se; denying without prejudice to renewal 42 Motion for an Extension of the deadline for expert identification. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 10/28/2020. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Gregory Ramos on 10/28/2020 to his address of record. (KAH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. Hy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Hy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Beyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Buffalo Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?