Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramos a/k/a Prospect v. USA
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner: Gregory Ramos
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Ramos
as 20-4275
Defendant / Appellant: Gregory Ramos, AKA Prospect
Appellee: United States of America
Ramos v. Hy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06246
Plaintiff: Gregory Ramos
Defendant: Richard Hy, John Beyer, Beyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Lundin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06210
Plaintiff: Gregory Ramos
Defendant: Carl Lundin, James Dunham, Christopher Sterlace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. State of New York DOCS
as 1:2017cv01223
Petitioner: Gregory Ramos
Respondent: State of New York DOCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMOS v. LOCAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00792
Plaintiff: GREGORY RAMOS
Defendant: LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY SHERIFF, SCOTT A. MUMMERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Garman et al
as 3:2016cv02448
Petitioner: Gregory Ramos
Respondent: Mark Garman and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMOS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2015cv00069
Petitioner: GREGORY RAMOS
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E. WETZEL and NANCY A. GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Diamond Parking Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00149
Movant: Eric Schroeder
Respondent: Diamond Parking Inc. , Diamond Parking Services, LLC , Stephen J. Kozlowski and others
Ramos v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2009cv00013
Plaintiff: A Gregory Ramos, A Gregory Ramos and A Gregory Ramos
Defendant: Sears Roebuck & Co, Sears Roebuck & Co, Sears Roebuck & Co and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?