Jhagroo v. Richardson et al
Ryan Jhagroo |
US Marshals, Secret Services, CIA, Lynette Bizhub, Barbara Richardson and FBI |
6:2021cv06208 |
March 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Charles J Siragusa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ryan Jhagroo. Plaintiff's address changed to: Ryan Jhagroo, 17-R-1739, MARCY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Box 3600, Old River Road, Marcy, NY 13403. (JHF) |
Filing 8 Letter request from Ryan Jhagroo. (BK) |
Copy of Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se plaintiff. (JLV) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #5 Reply/Response filed by Ryan Jhagroo., Plaintiff's renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Docket Item 5, is again denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee. The Court will grant Plaintiff a final opportunity to fix his errors, and Plaintiff has until 30 days from the date of this Order to either (1) submit a signed Certification or (2) pay the $402.00 in filing fees. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this deadline, this case will be dismissed without prejudice. To assist Plaintiff, the Clerk of Court shall send to Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application form that includes the Certification Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/19/21. Copy of this NEF and order mailed to pro se plaintiff at Wende.(KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Ryan Jhagroo. (BK) |
Filing 6 Prison Authorization from Ryan Jhagroo, dated 3/11/2021. (BK) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of CIA, FBI, Secret Services, US Marshals, Barbara Richardson, Lynette Bizhub against Ryan Jhagroo. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 3/9/2021. (JLV) Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff along with Doc. No. #3 Order, an authorization form and motion to proceed in forma pauperis form. |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice; the Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee; if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this Order; upon Plaintiff's submission of either (1) t a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of Plaintiff's inmate trust fund account or (2) the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee ($402.00 total), the Clerk of Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 03/08/2021. (MJK)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ryan Jhagroo. (BK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ryan Jhagroo. (BK) |
The Pro Se Packet including: the Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and the Civil Case Timeline have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (BK) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (BK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.