Burke v. Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina
Peter Burke, Sr. |
Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina |
2:2008cv00022 |
June 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Civil Rights: Voting Office |
PASQUOTANK |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER adopting 27 Memorandum and Recommendations and granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/08/2010. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burke v. Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Peter Burke, Sr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pasquotank County Board of Election - North Carolina | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.