TM, LLC v. Anderson, et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 28, 2013
ORDER granting 96 Motion to Stay All Further Proceedings - All proceedings in this action are stayed through December 10, 2013. This stay automatically terminates such that proceedings in this case may resume December 11, 2013, if a dismis sal is not filed by that time. Plaintiff may notice depositions of the Andersons to occur between December 11, 2013 and January 1, 2014. The parties may file dispositive motions on or before February 1, 2014. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/28/2013. (Baker, C.)
|September 6, 2013
ORDER granting 91 Motion to Modify Case Management Order - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/06/2013. (Baker, C.)
|January 18, 2013
ORDER granting 66 Motion Objecting to an Award of Costs and denying 73 Motion for Bill of Costs - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 01/18/2013. (Baker, C.)
|September 27, 2012
ORDER - The Desibia defendants' motion to dismiss (DE # 48) is GRANTED IN PART as to the RICO claims and DENIED IN PART as to lack of personal jurisdiction. Other defendants' first motion for costs and to strike (DE # 50) is DENIED AS MOOT and the second motion for costs and to strike (DE # 55) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as to the request for costs, as set forth in this order, and DENIED as to the request to strike certain allegations from the complaint. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time for service and to conduct discovery (DE # 60) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/26/2012. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?