Red Wolf Coalition et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
Red Wolf Coalition, Defenders of Wildlife and Animal Welfare Institute |
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Dan Ashe and Cynthia K. Dohner |
2:2015cv00042 |
November 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Northern Division Office |
TYRRELL |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/4/2018. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 72 ORDER denying without prejudice 67 Motion to Strike and Motion for Protective Order. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/3/2017. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 63 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion TO LIMIT THE STANDARD AND SCOPE OF REVIEW; granting 31 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants are hereby PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED from taking red wolves, either directly or by l andowner authorization, pursuant to 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.84 (c)(4)(v) and (c)(lO) without first demonstrating that such red wolves are a threat to human safety or the safety of livestock or pets. Plaintiffs are ordered to post a security in the amount of $100 not later than October 5, 2016. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 9/28/2016. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for important deadlines and information. (Stouch, L.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.