Thomas, et al v. Navient Solutions, Inc.
Cindy Thomas and Christen Call |
Navient Solutions, Inc. |
2:2016cv00055 |
July 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Northern Division Office |
PERQUIMANS |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 Order - This matter came before the court on final joint status report filed by defendant on March 6, 2019. 31 . The parties have advised the court that on February 18, 2019, following arbitration of this matter through the A merican Arbitration Association (AAA), an arbitrator issued order entering judgment in defendant's favor on its motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiff's request for reconsideration as moot. Pursuant to the arbitration order, the AAA has issued notice that this case is now closed. Accordingly, the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/12/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 12 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration - This matter is STAYED pending conclusion of arbitration. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report regarding the status of the arbitration 180 days from the date of this order, and every 180 days thereafter, until conclusion of the arbitration. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/12/2016. (Baker, C.) Modified on 12/12/2016 (Baker, C.). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.