Perry v. Colvin
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||September 23, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Northern Division Office
||James C. Dever
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 22, 2017
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay Plaintiff One Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty-One dollars and Twenty-Five cents ($1,781.25) in attorney's fees in full satisfaction of any and all claims a rising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. If such a debt exists, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, t hey will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney. If Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Commissioner will honor the agreement between Plaintiff and her attorney, and the fees will be made payable to and delivered to Plaintiffs attorney. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/22/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|July 17, 2017
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 24]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 18] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 24] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/17/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?