Save Our Sound OBX, Inc., et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, et al
| Save Our Sound OBX, Inc., Mark Haines, Jer Mehta, Glenn Stevens, David Hadley, Thomas Aschmoneit and Richard Ayella |
| North Carolina Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, John F. Sullivan, III and James H. Trogdon, III |
| Defenders of Wildlife and National Wildlife Refuge Association |
| 2:2017cv00004 |
| February 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Northern Division Office |
| DARE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
JUDGMENT - Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/4/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 101 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/16/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER - Plaintiffs motion to compel completion of the administrative record, or, in the alternative, production of extra-record evidence, 60 , is DENIED. Pursuant to section 1(h) of this courts order entered June 21, 2017, [5 8], the parties are DIRECTED to submit a revised proposed briefing schedule for summary judgment within 10 days hereof. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/20/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - The state defendants partial motion to dismiss based upon claimed untimeliness of plaintiffs comments is denied where submission of comments is no prerequisite to judicial review in actions of this nat ure. The conservation groups partial motion to dismiss is denied for the same reason and, in addition, because plaintiffs adequately have alleged injury falling within the zone of interests protected by Section 4(f) and because the scope of plaintiffs challenge is properly limited to reviewable documents.For the reasons set forth herein, the court denied defendants motions. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/5/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting plaintiff's oral motion for privilege log; denying Defendant's oral Motion for court's reconsideration as to not filing administrative record in CM/ECF. The court lifted stay of the defendant' ;s deadline to respond to the motion to compel with response due 9/19/17. Plaintiff's shall file a reply by 9/26/17. Privilege log shall be filed ex parte, in camera under seal by 9/19/17. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/1/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 45 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/30/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER AMENDING ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE 41 . Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/29/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 41 Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule - After considering the Parties' Joint Motion for Briefing Schedule, the Court finds that the requested schedule is reasonable. The case shall be governed by the sch edule set forth in the attached order. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 29) shall be stayed indefinitely. Plaintiffs do not intend to request that the stay of their motion for a preliminary injunction be lifted or to file a motion for a temporary restraining order or modified motion for preliminary injunction, unless Plaintiffs become aware of imminent ground disturbing activities or otherwise determine that it is unlikely that a decision on the merits will be rendered prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/23/2017. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Intervene - The Conservation Groups shall be Defendant-Intervenors in this action. The Proposed Answer [D.E. 19, Attachment 7], Proposed Motion for Partial Dismissal [D.E. 19, Attachment 8], and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal [D.E. 19, Attachment 9] provided with Conservation Groups' Unopposed Motion to Intervene now shall be filed separately on the docket by the movant. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/7/2017. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
