Sutton v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Tyrone Sutton
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv00049
Filed: October 18, 2017
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Northern Division Office
County: HERTFORD
Presiding Judge: James C. Dever
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 19, 2018 21 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that on motion of the Plaintiff, Tyrone Sutton, to dismiss this suit with prejudice, and it appearing that this action is appropriately dismissed by agreement of the parties it is ORDERED that this suit be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice from the Court's docket. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/19/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Sutton
Represented By: Joseph Russell Fentress, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Wanda D. Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?