Cesil v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
Janice Cesil |
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Lee Electrical Construction, Inc. |
2:2020cv00008 |
February 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by D. Martin Warf on behalf of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Warf, D.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Blake, Christopher) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher J. Blake on behalf of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Blake, Christopher) |
Filing 2 Notice filed by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company regarding #1 Notice of Removal, (Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet). (Blake, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company from Bertie County Superior Court, case number 20-CVS-0006. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5310093), filed by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons and Complaint, Bertie Co. 20-CVS-0006, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blake, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.