Pierce v. Saul
Plaintiff: Jackie Howard Pierce
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv00053
Filed: August 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Stouch, L.)
September 14, 2020 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number RAL080729.) filed by Jackie Howard Pierce. (Stouch, L.)
September 14, 2020 Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number RAL080729. (Stouch, L.)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffmay tender to the clerk the filing fee of $400.00 no later than September 21, 2020. If the plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee in the allotted time, the clerk shall close the matter without further order from the court. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 8/20/2020. (Edwards, S.)
August 14, 2020 Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever, III regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.)
August 11, 2020 Motions No Longer Referred: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.)
August 10, 2020 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.)
August 7, 2020 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jackie Howard Pierce (Vincent, Branch)
August 7, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Branch W. Vincent, III on behalf of Jackie Howard Pierce. (Vincent, Branch)
August 7, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Jackie Howard Pierce. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Proposed Summons US Atty General, #5 Proposed Summons General Counsel, #6 Proposed Summons US Atty, EDNC, #7 Exhibit Receipt US Atty General, #8 Exhibit Receipt General Counsel, #9 Exhibit Receipt US Atty EDNC) (Vincent, Branch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jackie Howard Pierce
Represented By: Branch W. Vincent, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?