Gray v. Saul
Plaintiff: Theresa M. Gray
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv00054
Filed: August 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Filing 12 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN for Summons and Complaint served on Attorney General of the United States on 9/18/2020. (Tripp, S.)
September 29, 2020 Filing 11 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN for Summons and Complaint served on Commissioner of Social Security on 9/18/2020. (Tripp, S.)
September 21, 2020 Filing 10 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service on US Attorney as to Andrew Saul served on 9/18/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. (Collins, S.)
September 4, 2020 Filing 9 Notice filed by Theresa M. Gray regarding #6 Summons Issued as to USA USM285-USAG. (Fentress, Joseph)
September 4, 2020 Filing 8 Notice filed by Theresa M. Gray regarding #6 Summons Issued as to USA USM285-USAG. (Fentress, Joseph)
September 4, 2020 Filing 7 Notice filed by Theresa M. Gray regarding #6 Summons Issued as to USA USM285-OGC. (Fentress, Joseph)
September 4, 2020 Summonses forwarded to US Marshals Service for service. (Castania, M)
September 1, 2020 SECOND Notice to Counsel. Counsel shall prepare the USM285 forms for service and file the forms using the event Notice-Other. (Collins, S.)
August 25, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.)
August 25, 2020 Notice to Counsel. Counsel shall prepare the USM285 forms for service and file the forms using the event Notice-Other. (Collins, S.)
August 14, 2020 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Theresa M. Gray. (Collins, S.)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 8/13/2020. (Castania, M)
August 12, 2020 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.)
August 11, 2020 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Theresa M. Gray (Fentress, Joseph)
August 11, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph Russell Fentress, IV on behalf of Theresa M. Gray. (Fentress, Joseph)
August 11, 2020 Filing 1 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Theresa M. Gray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Summons Attorney General, #5 Proposed Summons Commissioner, #6 Proposed Summons US Attorney) (Fentress, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa M. Gray
Represented By: Joseph Russell Fentress, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?