Corbin v. Saul
James Rox Corbin |
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
2:2020cv00060 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Affidavit of Service for Affidavit of Service Attorney General of the U.S. filed by James Rox Corbin served on Attorney General on 09/11/2020. (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 6 Affidavit of Service for Affidavit of Service US Atty for Eastern District of NC filed by James Rox Corbin served on US Atty for Eastern District of NC on 09/08/2020. (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 5 Affidavit of Service for Affidavit of Service General Counsel filed by James Rox Corbin served on General Counsel on 09/08/2020. (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, Attorney General, US Attorney. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by James Rox Corbin (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Branch W. Vincent, III on behalf of James Rox Corbin. (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5588492.), filed by James Rox Corbin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Atty General, #3 Proposed Summons Gen Counsel, #4 Proposed Summons US Atty, EDNC) (Vincent, Branch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.