Hill v. Windsor Police Department
| Michael Wayne Hill |
| Windsor Police Department |
| 2:2020cv00087 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 9 "Summary Statement" filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file his objections no later than Monday, February 8, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/25/2021. (Copy of Order sent to Michael Wayne Hill, 1665 Dogwood PL, Apartment 1955, Pensacola, FL 32505 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Objections to #4 Memorandum and Recommendation, filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Waddell, K.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #7 MOTION for Extension of Time. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Windsor Police Department, filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 5 DISREGARD ENTRY - WRONG DOCUMENT ATTACHED COMPLAINT against Windsor Police Department, filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Waddell, K.) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Wayne Hill. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is ALLOWED, and it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 1/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/6/2021. (Copy of Order and Memorandum and Recommendation sent to Michael Wayne Hill, 1665 Dogwood PL, Apartment 1955, Pensacola, FL 32505 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Edwards, S.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Michael Wayne Hill (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Document in Support of Notice) (Edwards, S.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Wayne Hill. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Document in Support of Motion, #2 Attachment - Proposed Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (Edwards, S.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. Windsor Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Windsor Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
