Upton v. Saul
| Christine Gail Upton |
| Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv00023 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Financial Disclosure Statement by Christine Gail Upton (Jones, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, Civil Process Clerk, Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.)
|
|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding [1-8] Financial Disclosure Statement. The Financial Disclosure statement is a stand alone document therefore Counsel is directed to refile the Financial Disclosure Statement using the event "Other Documents - Financial Disclosure Statement. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Appearance filed by David A. Jones on behalf of Christine Gail Upton. (Jones, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6036096.), filed by Christine Gail Upton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Civil Process Clerk, #3 Exhibit Process Receipt Civil Process Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons Commissioner of SSA, #5 Exhibit Process Receipt Comm. SSA, #6 Proposed Summons US Attorney General, #7 Exhibit Process Receipt US Attorney General, #8 Financial Disclosure Sheet) (Jones, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
