Erford et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| Candace Erford, Colleen Szwaba and Jonathan Seaman |
| Government Employees Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv00035 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. The Honorable Richard E. Myers II, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 5:21-CV-314-M. No further filing shall be made in 2:21-CV-35-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/3/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division. New case number: 5:21-cv-314-M. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6168796.), filed by Candace Erford, Jonathan Seaman, Colleen Szwaba. Amendment to #1 Complaint and Demand for Trial by Jury (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ledford, Joseph) Modified on 8/3/2021 to correct document description in docket text (Waddell, K.). |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Candace Erford, Jonathan Seaman, Colleen Szwaba. (Ledford, Joseph) Modified on 8/3/2021 to correct document description in docket text (Waddell, K.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
