Mosimann v. Mayorkas et al
Rafeal De Lima Mosimann |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud and Lisa Wohlrab |
2:2022cv00003 |
January 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Naturalization Application |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Rafeal De Lima Mosimann as to Mayorkas, USCIS/DHS, Renaud, Wohlrab,. (Tedesco, Mary Lynn) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Lisa Wohlrab, Attorney General, US Attorney. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Rafeal De Lima Mosimann (Tedesco, Mary Lynn) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Mary Lynn Anna Tedesco on behalf of Rafeal De Lima Mosimann. (Tedesco, Mary Lynn) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Amended Complaint - Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documents. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Rafeal De Lima Mosimann. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lisa Wohlrab, Tracy Renaud, and Alejandro Mayorkas, filed by Rafeal De Lima Mosimann. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Permanent Resident ID Card, #2 Exhibit 2- Form I-797C, Notice of Action form, #3 Exhibit 3- N-652, Naturalization Interview Results form, #4 Exhibit 4- Letters from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - Request for Evidence, #5 Exhibit 5- Notice to Appear, #6 Exhibit 6- Order of the Immigration Judge, #7 Exhibit 7- Email dated 1/28/21, #8 Exhibit 8- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Notice, #9 Proposed Summons Mayorkas, #10 Proposed Summons Wohlrab, #11 Proposed Summons Garland, #12 Proposed Summons Renaud, #13 Proposed Summons US Attorneys Office, #14 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tedesco, Mary Lynn) Modified on 1/20/2022 to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) Modified on 1/20/2022 - changed who Amended Complaint was filed against as filer selected plaintiff as both the filer and the person the amended complaint was filed against. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lisa Wohlrab, Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6400145.), filed by Rafeal De Lima Mosimann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8) (Tedesco, Mary Lynn) Modified on 1/20/2022 - changed who the Complaint was filed against as filer selected plaintiff as both filer and who it was filed againts. (Sellers, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.