Bates v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Joshua Thomas Bates
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv00006
Filed: February 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 Filing 9 Process Receipt and Return for Summons and Complaint served on Commissioner of Social Security on 3/3/22. (Collins, S.)
March 7, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service on US Attorney as to Kilolo Kijakazi served on 3/3/2022, answer due 5/2/2022. (Collins, S.)
March 7, 2022 Filing 7 Process Receipt and Return for Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney General on 3/2/22. (Collins, S.) Modified on 3/7/2022 to revise docket text. (Collins, S.).
February 4, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.)
February 4, 2022 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi filed by Joshua Thomas Bates. (Collins, S.)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by plaintiff [D.E. 1-2, 1-4, 1-5 and 1-6]. The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve defendant by delivering each summons to the addressee listed in the summons along with a copy of the complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers on 2/4/2022. (Collins, S.)
February 4, 2022 Notice of Social Security Case Filing (Collins, S.)
February 4, 2022 Remark - Certified copy of Order #4 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statements forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Collins, S.)
February 4, 2022 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.)
February 3, 2022 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Joshua Thomas Bates (Vincent, Branch)
February 3, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Branch W. Vincent, III on behalf of Joshua Thomas Bates. (Vincent, Branch)
February 3, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Joshua Thomas Bates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Summons US Atty, EDNC, #5 Proposed Summons US Atty General, #6 Proposed Summons Gen Counsel, #7 Exhibit Receipt US Atty EDNC, #8 Exhibit Receipt US Atty General, #9 Exhibit Receipt Gen Counsel) (Vincent, Branch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bates v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Thomas Bates
Represented By: Branch W. Vincent, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?