Savage, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
Roger D. Savage, Jr. |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2023cv00015 |
March 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Brian S Meyers |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Wanda D. Mason on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Mason, Wanda) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/3/2023. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by Roger D. Savage, Jr. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Corrected Document) filed by Roger D. Savage, Jr.. (Bowling, Russell) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Corrected Document). (Stouch, L.) |
NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE SERVICE - This action is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate office within the Social Security of the General Counsel and the United States Attorneys Office of this case and Plaintiffs complaint. No summons will issue. Defendants deadline to serve an answer or motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 is governed by Supplemental Rule 4. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Russell R. Bowling on behalf of Roger D. Savage, Jr.. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Roger D. Savage, Jr.. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Roger D. Savage, Jr. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Roger D. Savage, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowling, Russell) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Filing is not text searchable. Local Civil Rule 5.1 requires that all documents submitted for filing be in a text searchable format. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #2 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel failed to date and sign in the designated space for the signature block. Counsel is directed to refile the document. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Savage, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roger D. Savage, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Russell R. Bowling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Wanda D. Mason |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.