Fulcher v. The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
Plaintiff: Garland Christopher Fulcher
Defendant: The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
Case Number: 4:2008cv00060
Filed: April 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Contract: Marine Office
County: PAMLICO
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 46:951 Foreclosure of Preferred Mortgage
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fulcher v. The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garland Christopher Fulcher
Represented By: Stevenson L. Weeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?